Abstract
The application of instrumented indentation to assess material properties like Young’s modulus and microhardness has become a standard method. In recent developments, indentation experiments and simulations have been combined to inverse methods, from which further material parameters such as yield strength, work hardening rate, and tensile strength can be determined. In this work, an inverse method is introduced by which material parameters for cyclic plasticity, i.e., kinematic hardening parameters, can be determined. To accomplish this, cyclic Vickers indentation experiments are combined with finite element simulations of the indentation with unknown material properties, which are then determined by inverse analysis. To validate the proposed method, these parameters are subsequently applied to predict the uniaxial stress–strain response of a material with success. The method has been validated successfully for a quenched and tempered martensitic steel and for technically pure copper, where an excellent agreement between measured and predicted cyclic stress–strain curves has been achieved. Hence, the proposed inverse method based on cyclic nanoindentation, as a quasi-nondestructive method, could complement or even substitute the resource-intensive conventional fatigue testing in the future for some applications.
Highlights
Depth-sensing indentations or instrumented indentations are very useful means to characterize and determine mechanical properties (i.e., Young’s modulus and hardness) of thin films as well as of bulk materials [1,2,3,4,5]
A comprehensive comparison of the hardness measurement approaches at diverse scales of Brinell, Vickers, Meyer, Rockwell, Shore, IHRD, Knoop, and Buchholz was performed by Broitman [11]
By which the material parameters determined in an iterative way by an optimization
Summary
Depth-sensing indentations or instrumented indentations are very useful means to characterize and determine mechanical properties (i.e., Young’s modulus and hardness) of thin films as well as of bulk materials [1,2,3,4,5]. Hyung [6] and Suresch et al [7,8] have proposed two novel methods to identify the elastic modulus, yield strength, and the hardening exponent through nano-indentation. A comprehensive comparison of the hardness measurement approaches at diverse scales (i.e., nano, micro, and macro) of Brinell, Vickers, Meyer, Rockwell, Shore, IHRD, Knoop, and Buchholz was performed by Broitman [11]. He has described each indentation method but has presented its inadequacies in evaluating results. He has discussed the effects of elasticity, plasticity, pileup, sink-in, grain size, Materials 2020, 13, 3126; doi:10.3390/ma13143126 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.