Abstract

In powder bed-based additive manufacturing (AM), complex geometries can be produced in a layer-wise approach. Results of material science experiments regarding material property identification, e.g., tensile strength, show interdependencies between the test load direction and the layer orientation. This goes hand-in-hand with the measured cutting force, changing with the relative angle between cutting direction and layer orientation in orthogonal cutting tests. However, due to the specific process characteristics, the layer orientation results in anisotropic material properties. Therefore, during machining, the material behaves depending on the buildup direction, which influences the cutting process. To predict this behavior, a simplified inverse approach is developed to determine the buildup direction-dependent parameters of a modified Johnson–Cook model for cutting simulation. To qualify these cutting models, mainly the cutting force and additionally the chip formation examined during orthogonal cuts are used. In the present paper, the influence of the laser-powder-bed-fusion (LPBF) process parameters on subtractive post-processing are shown. A good agreement between verification experiments and simulations is achieved.

Highlights

  • The LPBF process, as used for this research, utilizes lasers as a heat source to selectively melt powder in a thin layer

  • The objective of this paper was to present inverse parameter identification based on FE simulations to determine the Johnson–Cook parameters A, B, and n for maraging stee

  • M300 used for additive manufacturing in the two built-up directions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The LPBF process, as used for this research, utilizes lasers as a heat source to selectively melt powder in a thin layer. Repetition of this process over multiple layers can create complex three-dimensional structures. Due to the selectively induced heat and large cooldown rates, a fine dendritic microstructure forms along the build-up direction [2]. This leads to an anisotropic material behavior, which affects the cutting process [3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call