Abstract

Invasive plants are major drivers of habitat modification and the scale of their impact is increasing globally as anthropogenic activities facilitate their spread. In California, an invasive plant genus of great concern is Eucalyptus. Eucalyptus leaves can alter soil chemistry and negatively affect underground macro- and microbial communities. Amphibians serve as excellent models to evaluate the effect of Eucalyptus invasion on ground-dwelling species as they predate on soil arthropods and incorporate soil microbes into their microbiotas. The skin microbiota is particularly important to amphibian health, suggesting that invasive plant species could ultimately affect amphibian populations. To investigate the potential for invasive vegetation to induce changes in microbial communities, we sampled microbial communities in the soil and on the skin of local amphibians. Specifically, we compared Batrachoseps attenuatus skin microbiomes in both Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae) and native Quercus agriflolia (Fagaceae) dominated forests in the San Francisco Bay Area. We determined whether changes in microbial diversity and composition in both soil and Batrachoseps attenuatus skin were associated with dominant vegetation type. To evaluate animal health across vegetation types, we compared Batrachoseps attenuatus body condition and the presence/absence of the amphibian skin pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. We found that Eucalyptus invasion had no measurable effect on soil microbial community diversity and a relatively small effect (compared to the effect of site identity) on community structure in the microhabitats sampled. In contrast, our results show that Batrachoseps attenuatus skin microbiota diversity was greater in Quercus dominated habitats. One amplicon sequence variant identified in the family Chlamydiaceae was observed in higher relative abundance among salamanders sampled in Eucalyptus dominated habitats. We also observed that Batrachoseps attenuatus body condition was higher in Quercus dominated habitats. Incidence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis across all individuals was very low (only one Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis positive individual). The effect on body condition demonstrates that although Eucalyptus may not always decrease amphibian abundance or diversity, it can potentially have cryptic negative effects. Our findings prompt further work to determine the mechanisms that lead to changes in the health and microbiome of native species post-plant invasion.

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic habitat modification has dramatic direct and indirect effects on wild animal populations (Acevedo-Whitehouse & Duffus, 2009)

  • While the effect of invasive vegetation can vary based on the biology of the plant and age of invasion (Hejda, Pyšek & Jarošík, 2009), changes in native community diversity and composition have been documented in areas that have been dominated by invasive plants (Batten et al, 2006; Tererai et al, 2013; Litt et al, 2014)

  • Eucalyptus invasion has a small effect on microhabitat soil microbial community composition We found no differences in soil microbial alpha diversity between Eucalyptus and Quercus dominated habitats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anthropogenic habitat modification has dramatic direct and indirect effects on wild animal populations (Acevedo-Whitehouse & Duffus, 2009). Invasive plants are known to affect many patterns and processes in native communities (e.g., changes in habitat structure, productivity, pH, transpiration, etc.), which in turn can have profound impacts on native species (Pysek et al, 2012; Vila et al, 2011). One way that invasive plants impact native animal populations is by altering their microbial commensals. Plant invasions could influence the microbial community structure of native fauna by changing microbial communities that hosts are exposed to, by altering host physiology, or both (Christian, Whitaker & Clay, 2015). Among wild populations in relatively natural habitats, some studies have found that microbiomes vary significantly with habitat type (Bird et al, 2018; Bletz et al, 2017) whereas others have found that microbiomes are relatively conserved and coevolve with hosts (Prado-Irwin et al, 2017). Whether changes in the local microbial community structure affect host microbial symbionts remains an open question

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call