Abstract
AbstractAimThe concept of “island disharmony” has been widely applied to describe the systematic over‐ and under‐representation of taxa on islands compared to mainland regions. Here, we explore an extension of that concept to biological invasions. We compare biogeographical patterns in native and non‐native beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages from around the world to test whether beetle invasions represent a random sample of species or whether some families are more prone to invade than others.LocationGlobal.MethodsNumbers of non‐native beetle species established in ten regions worldwide were compared with the land area of each region. The distribution of species among families was compared with the distribution among families for all species native to the same region and with the distribution among families for the global pool of all known beetle species. Ordination analysis was used to characterize differences among native and non‐native assemblages based upon the distribution of species among families.ResultsWe report a total of 1,967 non‐native beetle species across all ten regions, and a classic log–log relationship between numbers of species per region and land area though relationships are generally stronger for native assemblages. Some families (e.g., Dermestidae and Bostrichidae) are over‐represented and others (e.g., Carabidae, Scarabaeidae and Buprestidae) are under‐represented in non‐native assemblages. The distribution of species among families is generally similar among native assemblages with greatest similarities among nearby regions. In contrast, non‐native species assemblages are more similar to each other than to native species assemblages.Main conclusionsCertain families are over‐represented, and others are under‐represented in non‐native beetle assemblages compared to native assemblages, indicating “invasion disharmony” in the global representation of beetle families. Similarities in composition among non‐native assemblages may reflect unobserved associations with invasion pathways and life‐history traits that shape invasion success of different insect groups.
Highlights
| INTRODUCTION“Island disharmony,” originally termed by Carlquist (1965), describes the systematic over- or under-representation of certain taxonomic groups on islands compared to mainland source regions
We propose the term “invasion disharmony” to refer to systematic over-and under-representation of higher-level taxa among non-native assemblages compared to native assemblages
In a manner similar to the colonization of islands, transport and establishment of non-native species filter the pool of potentially invading species and drive differences based on life history and other characteristics of species
Summary
“Island disharmony,” originally termed by Carlquist (1965), describes the systematic over- or under-representation of certain taxonomic groups on islands compared to mainland source regions This phenomenon has been repeatedly observed when comparing the flora and fauna of oceanic islands with that of mainland assemblages and is believed to result from selective assembly mechanisms, such as filtering based on dispersal capacity, permitting only a subset of mainland species to successfully colonize islands (Gillespie & Roderick, 2002; König et al, 2020). Given the potentially analogous relationship of community assembly via island colonization with assembly via biological invasions (Burns, 2015), it is logical to investigate whether a similar phenomenon of disharmony can be observed in comparing native and non-native species assemblages. We test whether the family-level composition of species invading a given region is similar to the composition of native species in that region or whether they more closely resemble the composition of other invading assemblages
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
