Abstract

Territoriality is a widespread behaviour in animals and its analysis is crucial in several areas of behavioural, ecological and evolutionary research. Commonly, territory size is assessed through territory mapping and the application of simple area estimators such as minimum convex polygons. In the present study we demonstrate that territory size can be determined adequately with an active approach through intrusion experiments, a technique that is commonly used in behavioural research in other contexts. Tests with simulated data indicate that a minimum of twelve trials needs to be performed to establish reliable orders of relative territory size. To estimate absolute territory size, detailed hull techniques are most appropriate when analyzing point patterns of intrusion experiments, while the local convex hull estimator enables the construction of internal utilization distributions based on such point patterns. Additionally we suggest a ‘stretch the centre’ approach to emphasize the actual process of intrusion experiments in the construction of internal utilization distributions. To demonstrate the utility of the method, we apply all findings from the simulations to data from fieldwork with the model species Allobates femoralis, a territorial aromobatid frog from the lowland rainforest of French Guiana.

Highlights

  • The territory of an animal is usually defined as an area of intense and often exclusive use, which is announced and delimited by visual, acoustic, chemical and/or electric cues

  • In this study we describe the method of intrusion experiments to assess territory size and find the most suitable area estimators for the point patterns produced in these experiments

  • Absolute territory size of the detailed hulls (DH) estimator did not increase more than 2% stepwise with an increasing number of equiangular trials from 20 trials upwards for all but the ‘irregular’ territory (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The territory of an animal is usually defined as an area of intense and often exclusive use, which is announced and delimited by visual, acoustic, chemical and/or electric cues. In most cases a territory is defended by physical aggression against conspecifics, but sometimes heterospecific intruders of either one or both sexes [1]. This opposes the concept of a territory to that of a home range, which is defined as the entire area used by an individual in its regular activities [2]. Higher resource abundance can allow for smaller territories, especially in the light of trade-offs between costs and benefits of large territories [5] (but see [6])

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.