Abstract

Evaluating skin properties is often too subjective. Using the cutometer allows one to take objective measures of certain mechanic properties of the skin such as visco-elasticity. The aim of this article is to evaluate through a review of existing literature the advantages and the limits of the cutometer and to propose an improvement. The selection of articles has been conducted with the PubMed database in order to identify all publications concerning the cutometer up until September2013. The analysis criteria were: (1) quantitative distribution of articles from the first publication until today; (2) qualitative distribution over the various medical fields. The articles have been organized in 3groups: medical, surgical and burns; (3) list of biases in the interpretation of results and limits of this measuring tool. One hundred and twenty-nine publications have been included. The first article regarding the cutometer was published in 1994. We observe an increase in the number of publications after 2005. Most of the articles were published in medical journals of dermatology or cosmetology (83%), only 9% of articles have been published in burn study journals and 8% in surgical journals. The pressure applied by the experimenter constitutes the main measure bias. The use of an external device maintaining the probe with an invariable pressure corresponding to its own weight enables more reliable results all the while limiting the inter- and intra-individual variability.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.