Abstract

Measured against other Western democracies at the dawn of the twentieth century, the American state stood out as distinctive. A homosexual-heterosexual binary, in other words, was being inscribed in federal citizenship policy during early years. Homosexuality is thus a legal category as much as a medical or psychiatric one. The state is notoriously difficult to conceptualize and write about. Citizenship fosters “internal differentiation and hierarchy,” by incorporating some into citizenship in a way that highlights their subordination or “degraded status.” The regulation of homosexuality in women was also affected by the overall broadening of homosexuality that state policies had helped to bring about. State policies directed at sex/gender nonconformists have generally not operated by targeting large numbers—and especially true for the earlier period. An alternative approach might look vertically at local-state-federal interaction rather than horizontally across several institutions of the federal state.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.