Abstract
Interpreting in law, before being a moment of law enforcement, is the first operation that prepares and rationalizes the elaboration of the law, of any normative act, in general. What we consider to be necessary is that the prior application of the European Convention on Human Rights takes place not only in the case of conflict of laws but also in the case of non-compliance resulting from different interpretations of the legal provisions. From this justification, it is not difficult to observe that the European Union's normative acts apply as a priority in relation to national law.
Highlights
What we consider to be necessary is that the prior application of the European Convention on Human Rights takes place in the case of conflict of laws and in the case of non-compliance resulting from different interpretations of the legal provisions20
It is not difficult to observe that the European Union's normative acts apply as a priority in relation to national law
We share the view expressed in the literature that the rules of interpretation resulting from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of these normative acts have a priority character, as a rule
Summary
In-Text Citation: (Tache, 2019) To Cite this Article: Tache, G.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
