Abstract
AbstractIn an age of profound democratic anxiety, significant academic attention has been paid to the crisis in constitutional democracy. Constitutional lawyers, however, are still grappling with the relationship between public law and the current actual and perceived threats facing constitutional democracy in countries worldwide. This Introduction considers how the articles in this special volume address three pressing questions. How should we should define the current threats to democracy, and populist challenge? Second, how might public law be a potential cause or contributing factor? Third, how might public law still provide some answers to the contemporary challenges to constitutional democracy? In Prof Dixon’s view, constitutional democracy is a good worth preserving and there are models of at least relative “success” in the current constitutional universe. But Prof Dixon shares the view of many contributors to the special volume that the challenge is immense, and urgent, and that there are no easy solutions.
Highlights
Public law and populism Rosalind Dixon*(Received 17 December 2018; accepted 20 January 2019) AbstractIn an age of profound democratic anxiety, significant academic attention has been paid to the crisis in constitutional democracy
We are living in an age of profound democratic anxiety
The last year alone saw the publication of a range of books on the future of democracy by leading political scientists, philosophers, and constitutional lawyers —including Levitsky and Ziblatt,[1] Runciman,[2] Mounk,[3] and Ginsburg and Huq.[4]
Summary
Public law and populism Rosalind Dixon*(Received 17 December 2018; accepted 20 January 2019) AbstractIn an age of profound democratic anxiety, significant academic attention has been paid to the crisis in constitutional democracy. We are living in an age of profound democratic anxiety.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have