Abstract

Some economic ideas are too interesting to be left to economists. This book proposes to unpack the implications of one such idea: Adam Smith’s ‘invisible hand’, a metaphor little noted at the first publication of The Wealth of Nations in 1776, but one that has since come to stand in for almost all there is of capitalist moral philosophy. Though a long-lasting and hard-working metaphor, Smith’s ‘invisible hand’ metaphor dissolves away, when you try to analyse it, into a surprisingly fragile and self-contradictory set of perspectival viewpoints. But I believe there is a reason for the metaphor’s longevity: it suggests an ironic mode of social action in which the results of individual actions are displaced to some indefinite spatial and temporal distance, creating by implication an unimaginably complex and detailed web of moral causality. The discipline of political economy, as it developed after Smith, generally accepted Smith’s optimistic take on this moral complexity, suggesting that free-market policies spontaneously led to prosperous and stable social orders in ways that could not be controlled or even known in detail by the state, but could be easily ascertained in retrospect. In the twentieth century, defenders of capitalism (like Friedrich Hayek) suggested that the very incalculability suggested by the ‘invisible hand’ metaphor proved the superiority of capitalist to socialist economic regimes.KeywordsPolitical EconomyFree TradeCentury Credit Default SwapLiterary CriticInvisible HandThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call