Abstract

The Renaissance was the Ruin-naissance, the birth of the ruin as a distinct category of cultural discourse that became an inspirational force in the poetic imagination, artistic expression, and historical inquiry of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Europe. The ruin functions as a privileged cipher or master topos that marks the rupture between the world of the humanists and the world of antiquity. The Renaissance sees a new understanding of both ruins and poetics, made possible by sustained meditation on the crumbled monuments of antiquity. The book imagines fluid multiplicity rather than fixed monumentalization as a survival strategy in the classical tradition. Its method is avowedly a philological one. This approach is particularly appropriate to the subject matter, since both philology and the study of ruins are fundamentally concerned with the figure of synecdoche, about imagining the whole through their parts. To make its case, the book uses three words with particularly rich semantic reach and deep etymological roots: vestigium in Petrarch, cendre in Du Bellay, and moniment in Spenser. They form “word clouds” in their authors’ œuvres: verbal constellations of associations that provide different iterations of the materiality of memory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.