Abstract

Shot peening is widely used for improving mechanical properties especially fatigue behavior of metallic components by inducing surface hardening, compressive residual stresses and surface grain refinement. In air blast shot peening, projection pressure and surface coverage (an index of peening duration) have been considered as major controlling process parameters; the combination of these parameters plays a critical role in the beneficial effects of shot peening. Generally in severe shot peening aimed at obtaining surface grain refinement, constant values of pressure are considered with different peening durations. Considering very high peening duration, however, the phenomenon of over shot peening, which can be identified with the formation of surface defects could occur. The present study introduces a novel shot peening treatment, here called gradient severe shot peening (GSSP) that instead of using constant projection pressure, implements gradually increasing or decreasing pressures. The gradual increase of the projection pressure acts as a pre-hardening stage for the following higher projection pressure boosting the potential of the material to tolerate the sequential impacts and thus become less prone to the formation of surface defects. The results of the experiments indicate significant fatigue life improvement obtained for GSSP treated specimens compared to the standard treatment with constant pressure. GSSP avoids the detrimental effects of over-peening, while maintaining the beneficial effects of surface nano-crystallization, surface hardening and compressive residual stresses. The notable difference in fatigue strength enhancement for GSSP treated material can be also attributed to the modulated surface morphology with lower surface roughness compared to a standard shot peening treatment with the same exposure time.

Highlights

  • It has been reported that by increasing the Almen intensity and surface coverage and raising the kinetic energy of the SP treatment compared to the ones used in the conventional shot peening (CSP), so called severe shot peening (SSP) or high energy shot peening (HESP) processes can be ­obtained[19–21]

  • For the specimens treated with high energy treatments including SSP, over shot peening (OSP), ascending severe shot peening (ASSP) and ascending-descending severe shot peening (ADSSP), the variations of surface roughness can be clearly observed in FESM cross-sectional micrographs (Fig. 4c–f)

  • The SSP and OSP treatments differ just in their exposure times; the results indicate that after a particular peening duration at the same Almen intensity, multiple defects can be created on the surface layer potentially overshadowing the beneficial effects of the treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been reported that by increasing the Almen intensity and surface coverage and raising the kinetic energy of the SP treatment compared to the ones used in the conventional shot peening (CSP), so called severe shot peening (SSP) or high energy shot peening (HESP) processes can be ­obtained[19–21]. In OSP higher surface hardening and higher compressive residual stresses can be achieved but due to the very high kinetic energy of the shot impacts, multiple surface defects including nano/micro-cracks, and overlaps can form on the treated s­ urface[31] These defects have high detrimental effects on mechanical properties of the SP treated material, often leading to fatigue strength ­reduction[32–39]. The projection pressure in ASSP is continuously ascending while in ADSSP it gradually increases to reach a maximum value and decreases In these two processes, the detrimental effects of OSP are avoided, while maintaining the beneficial effects of surface nano-crystallization, surface hardening and compressive residual stresses. Comprehensive experimental analyses in terms of microstructural characterization, roughness, microhardness and residual stresses measurements as well as axial fatigue tests are performed to compare different categories of treatments based on SP

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call