Abstract

BackgroundSampling a small number of participants from an entire country is not straightforward. In this case, researchers reluctantly sample from a single setting or few settings, which limits the generalizability of findings. Therefore, there is a need to design efficient sampling method for small sample size surveys that can produce generalizable results at the country level.MethodsData comprised of twenty proxy variables to measure health services demands, structures, and outcomes of 413 districts of Iran. We used two data mining methods (hierarchical clustering method (HCM) and model-based clustering method (MCM)) to create homogenous groups of districts, i.e., strata based on these variables. We compared the internal and stability validity of the methods by statistical indices. An expert group checked the face validity of the methods, particularly regarding the total number of strata and the combination of districts in each stratum. The efficiency of selected method, which is measured by the inverse of variance, was compared with a simple random sampling (SRS) through simulation. The sampling design was tested in a national study in Iran, which aimed to evaluate the quality and costs of medical care for eight selected diseases by only recruiting 300 participants per disease at the country level.ResultsMCM and HCM divided the districts into eight and two clusters, respectively. The measures of internal and stability validity showed that clusters created by MCM were more separated, compact, and stable, thus forming our optimum strata. The probability of death from stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and in-hospital mortality rate were the most important indicators that distinguished the eight strata. Based on the simulation results, MCM increased the efficiency of the sampling design up to 1.7 times compared to SRS.ConclusionsThe use of data mining improved the efficiency of sampling up to 1.7 times greater than SRS and markedly reduced the number of strata to eight in the entire country. The proposed sampling design also identified key variables that could be used to classify districts in Iran for sampling from these target populations in the future studies.

Highlights

  • Sampling a small number of participants from an entire country is not straightforward

  • Whereas model-based clustering method (MCM) recommended eight clusters based on the Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) criteria (Additional File 1-Part B)

  • The validity of clustering methods We compared the internal validity of results from MCM and hierarchical clustering method (HCM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sampling a small number of participants from an entire country is not straightforward. Problem statement and objectives Survey is one of the most common instruments to collect population and public health data National health studies such as ‘STEPwise approach to Surveillance of Non-Communicable Diseases’ (STEPS) [1], ‘Demographic Health Surveys’ (DHS) [2], and health care Utilization studies [3] rely on survey methods. Except these national studies, which are priority research for national health authorities, many other surveys in low- and middle-income countries have limited budgets, thereby unable to recruit such a large sample They rely on sample sizes that are commonly known as small samples, e.g., less than 500 participants, compared to sample recruited by STEPS or DHS studies. There is a need to design efficient sampling method for small sample size surveys that can produce generalizable results at the country level

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call