Abstract

The phase change of water from liquid to vapor is one of the most energy-intensive physical processes in nature, giving it immense potential for cooling. Diverse evaporative cooling strategies have resulted worldwide, including roof ponds and sprinklers, courtyard fountains, wind catchers with qanats, irrigated green roofs, and fan-assisted evaporative coolers. These methods all require water in bulk liquid form. The evaporation of moisture that has been sorbed from the atmosphere by hygroscopic materials is equally energy-intensive, however, yet has not been examined for its cooling potential. In arid and semi-arid climates, hygroscopic earth buildings occur widely and are known to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures, but evaporation of moisture from their walls and roofs has been regarded as unimportant since water scarcity limits irrigation and rainfall; instead, their cool interiors are attributed to well-established mass effects in delaying the transmission of sensible gains. Here, we investigate the cooling accomplished by daily cycles of moisture sorption and evaporation which, requiring only ambient humidity, we designate as “intrinsic” evaporative cooling. Connecting recent soil science to heat and moisture transport studies in building materials, we use soils, adobe, cob, unfired earth bricks, rammed earth, and limestone to reveal the effects of numerous parameters (temperature and relative humidity, material orientation, thickness, moisture retention properties, vapor diffusion resistance, and liquid transport properties) on the magnitude of intrinsic evaporative cooling and the stabilization of indoor relative humidity. We further synthesize these effects into concrete design guidance. Together, these results show that earth buildings in diverse climates have significant potential to cool themselves evaporatively through sorption of moisture from humid night air and evaporation during the following day’s heat. This finding challenges the perception of limited evaporative cooling resources in arid climates and greatly expands the applicability of evaporative cooling in contemporary buildings to water-stressed regions.

Highlights

  • The energy used to cool buildings worldwide is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades, continuing a trend that is already apparent

  • Capitalizing on the diversity of materials and climatic regions found in earth building practices, as well as recent progress in understanding the evaporative behavior of earth materials, we investigate the relationships between hygroscopic properties and intrinsic evaporative cooling capabilities of soils, adobe, cob, rammed earth, unfired earth bricks, and limestones under diverse climatic conditions, revealing characteristic patterns of performance that may inform climate-responsive evaporative cooling design

  • We have examined the relative influences of texture, climate, and solar orientation, material thickness, moisture retention properties, and liquid transport coefficients on intrinsic evaporative cooling, in materials for which those variations are relevant to designers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The energy used to cool buildings worldwide is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades, continuing a trend that is already apparent. Geosciences 2016, 6, 38 propelling combined heating and air conditioning emissions from ∼0.8 Gt in 2000 to ∼2.2 Gt in 2100, accounting for 12% of the global total, unless cooling methods change significantly [2] In pursuit of such change, those who design, build, and govern the codes of buildings are keenly interested in “passive” cooling techniques that rely primarily on site resources (wind, water, earth) and unassisted physical processes (natural convection, shading, evaporation, conduction) to remove heat from indoor spaces [3,4,5,6]. Capabilities of soils, adobe, cob, rammed earth, unfired earth bricks, and limestones under diverse climatic conditions, revealing characteristic patterns of performance that may inform climate-responsive evaporative cooling design

Materials and Methods
Hygroscopic Properties of Geological Materials
Coupled Heat and Moisture Transport
Procedures Followed for Assigning Controlling Parameters
Textural Controls on Soil Properties
Simulation of Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling in Buildings
Results and Discussion
Soil Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Mexican Green Roofs
Adobe Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Adobe
Cob Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Cob
Unfired Earth Bricks
Earth Brick Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Earth Bricks
Rammed Earth
Rammed Earth Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Rammed Earth
Apulian Limestone Hygroscopic Properties
Intrinsic Evaporative Cooling by Apulian Limestone
Conclusions
Choose Materials with Broad Particle Size Distributions
Match Materials to the Climate of Interest
Orient Surfaces to Cool During Desired Hours
Dedicate Individual Elements to Either Evaporative or Conductive Cooling
Allow Indoor Buffering of Relative Humidity
Extend Theoretical and Experimental Efforts
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call