Abstract

In his book I luoghi più oscuri e controversi della Divina Commedia di Dante dichiarati da lui stesso (1843), the Brescian scholar Giuseppe Picci (1809–1888) repeatedly uses the studies of Karl Witte, because he obviously sees him as an authority in the field of Dante Studies. A similar attitude towards Witte is also evident in later works that Picci dedicated to the question of the authenticity of the Epistola a Cangrande, although in these he took a position contrary to Witte’s. In the various editions of his successful Guida allo studio delle belle arti e al comporre, however, Picci at no point refers to the German scholar’s edition of the Commedia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.