Abstract

Purpose Among the retinal vascular diseases, burden of retinal vein occlusion is most common immediately after diabetic retinopathy. Intravitreal corticosteroids are gaining popularity in managing macular edema (ME) of RVO. Our study compares efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) and dexamethasone implant (IVD) over 6 months.MethodsThis comparative, prospective, randomized study on 40 patients of non-ischemic central RVO with significant ME (> 330 μm) of < 3 months duration. Study was done at Army Research Hospital between Sep-2012 and May-2014 in accordance to Helsinki Declaration. IVD group (n = 20) received Ozurdex® while IVTA group (n = 20) received triamcinolone-acetonide (4 mg/0.1 ml), followed up at day-1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24.ResultsAt 6 months, mean improvement in best corrected visual acuity and retinal thickness (CMT) in the IVD group was 0.43 logmar and 323 μm and in IVTA group was 0.49 logmar and 322 μm respectively. Proportion of patients achieving ≥ 15 letters was about 40% in both groups. IOP rise was significantly higher in IVTA group at 12 and 24 weeks. In IVTA group ≥ 10 mmHg IOP rise was seen in 60% of patients, 41.6% among them had > 35 mmHg and 66% needed combination treatment and failed to reach baseline line IOP at 6 months. In IVD group, 5 pts had IOP rise with all being < 26 mmHg and were easily managed with single agent with IOP reaching baseline by 6th month in all pts. Relative risk of IOP rise with IVTA is 2.4 times higher compared to IVD. Cataract progression and cataract surgeries were required at significantly higher rates in IVTA group. In IVTA group, cataract progression was seen in 35% patients, with 71.5% requiring cataract surgery at 6 months. IVD group, 10% patients had cataract progression while none required surgery at 6 months. Relative risk of cataract progression with IVTA is 3.5 times higher compared to IVD.ConclusionIntravitreal steroids are effective in managing macular edema of retinal vein occlusion, while newer formulation of sustained release dexamethasone implant is significantly safer than IVTA.

Highlights

  • Introduction and purposeAmong the retinal vascular diseases, burden of retinal vein occlusion is most common immediately afterIntravitreal corticosteroids are gaining popularity in managing macular edema (ME) of RVO as its effects span over controllingMishra et al Int J Retin Vitr (2018) 4:13 and limiting angiogenesis, re-establishing retinal fluid homeostasis and reducing edema, having anti-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects

  • Our study aims at comparative evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) and dexamethasone implant (IVD) over 6 months

  • Arterial hypertension was diagnosed in ten subjects (IVD group-4 pts; IVTA group-6 pts)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mishra et al Int J Retin Vitr (2018) 4:13 and limiting angiogenesis, re-establishing retinal fluid homeostasis and reducing edema, having anti-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects. Used intravitreal steroids are triamcinolone-acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant. Earlier studies have established both steroids in reducing macular edema with visual acuity improvement in patients of CRVO [7, 8]. Our study aims at comparative evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) and dexamethasone implant (IVD) over 6 months. Statistical analysis was done using Stata (College Station, USA). Continuous baseline characters were compared between groups using WilcoxonRanksum test and categorical baseline characteristics were compared using Fisher’s exact test The outcomes variable such as BCVA, IOP, CMT were compared between groups using Wilcoxon Ranksum test and within group using Wilcoxon Signed Ranksum test as sample size is small. VA is converted to logmar for statistical analysis

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call