Abstract
One hundred and twenty-seven intravenous urograms of patients with acute epididymitis were evaluated during a period of 9 years. The majority of these patients had normal urograms. A tuberculous renal lesion was found in only one case. Twenty-seven patients had prostatic enlargement and 10 of these were under 50 years of age. Other abnormalities which were found were not related to epididymitis. It is suggested that intravenous urography is indicated in patients with acute epididymitis only when there is evidence of previous tuberculosis or when laboratory findings arouse suspicion of genitourinary tuberculosis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
