Abstract

BackgroundThe concept that upper extremities can be used as an infusion route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pregnant women is a reasonable recommendation considering the characteristic circulation of pregnant women; however, this method is not based on scientific evidence.Objective of the reviewWe conducted a scoping review to determine whether the infusion route should be established above the diaphragm during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pregnant woman.DiscussionWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs on the infusion of fluids in pregnant women after 20 weeks of gestation requiring establishment of an infusion route due to cardiac arrest, massive bleeding, intra-abdominal bleeding, cesarean section, severe infection, or thrombosis. In total, 3150 articles from electronic database were extracted, respectively. After title and abstract review, 265 articles were extracted, and 116 articles were extracted by full-text screening, which were included in the final analysis. The 116 articles included 78 studies on infusion for pregnant women. The location of the intravenous infusion route could be confirmed in only 17 studies, all of which used the upper extremity to secure the venous route.ConclusionPregnant women undergo significant physiological changes that differ from those of normal adults, because of pressure and drainage of the inferior vena cava and pelvic veins by the enlarged uterus. Therefore, despite a lack of evidence, it seems logical to secure the infusion route above the diaphragm when resuscitating a pregnant woman.

Highlights

  • The concept that upper extremities can be used as an infusion route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pregnant women is a reasonable recommendation considering the characteristic circulation of pregnant women; this method is not based on scientific evidence

  • The American Heart Association (AHA) developed and illustrated an algorithm based on the International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) [2], which stated that intravenous access should be considered above the diaphragm [3]

  • This statement is justifiable considering the special circulatory dynamics of pregnancy, but we believe that it needs to be supported by evidence and not by a scientific recommendation based on evidence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept that upper extremities can be used as an infusion route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pregnant women is a reasonable recommendation considering the characteristic circulation of pregnant women; this method is not based on scientific evidence. The American Heart Association (AHA) developed and illustrated an algorithm based on the International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) [2], which stated that intravenous access should be considered above the diaphragm [3]. This statement is justifiable considering the special circulatory dynamics of pregnancy, but we believe that it needs to be supported by evidence and not by a scientific recommendation based on evidence. Pregnant women have a particular circulatory situation in which the inferior vena cava is compressed by the enlarged uterus, so the usual choice of infusion route during resuscitation of adults may not be applicable

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call