Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

Abstract

Abstract Background Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) potentially improves short and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, evidence regarding its efficacy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is limited. Objectives This study investigated the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. Methods From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011–2020, we identified 1,418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. Results Among the patients, 294 (20.7%) and 1,124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the 1-year TLF between both groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65–1.34, p=0.70) (Figure A). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30 days and between 30 days and 1 year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups (Figure B). Conclusions In patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve clinical outcomes with respect to 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Figure