Abstract

This study compared the long term outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease who underwent stenting under the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or conventional angiography at a large single center. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 3 years was one of the secondary outcomes. Between January 2004 and December 2011, a total of 1,899 patients who underwent IVUS-guided (n = 713, 37.5%) or conventional angiography-guided (n = 1186, 62.5%) stenting were included. At 3 years, the unadjusted primary outcome trended lower in the IVUS-guided group versus the angiography-guided (6.9% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.22) although the TVR was similar between two groups (6.0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.97). However, after adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors, IVUS-guidance was associated with significantly lower incidence of the composite of all-cause death and MI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.84; p = 0.001), although there was still no significant difference in TVR between the two groups (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.42; p = 0.53). IVUS guidance has benefits in improving the long-term prognosis for unprotected LMCA stenting.

Highlights

  • The beneficial effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guidance on clinical outcomes have been shown in the MAIN-COMPARE registry which enrolled 975 patients (756 IVUS guidance vs. 219 conventional angiography)[6]

  • The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years. -All-cause death, cardiac death, MI, Q-wave MI, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were considered to be IVUS guidance (n = 713)

  • In this study we found that IVUS-guided stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease reduced the primary safety outcome, but not the risk of Target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared with angiography-guided stenting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The beneficial effects of IVUS-guidance on clinical outcomes have been shown in the MAIN-COMPARE registry which enrolled 975 patients (756 IVUS guidance vs. 219 conventional angiography)[6]. There have been only a few large clinical studies concentrating on IVUS’s impact on unprotected LMCA PCI7–11. In this current study we sought to substantiate the safety and efficacy of IVUS-guided stent implantation on the long-term prognosis of patients who underwent unprotected LMCA stenting

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.