Intravascular Ultrasound during Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease, by Severity, Location, Device, and Procedure

Abstract

There is limited evidence for the role of Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We conducted retrospective cohort study utilizing the HCUP-AHRQ National Readmission database(NRD) to delineate outcomes in IVUS guided PVI versus non-IVUS guided PVI. The current study utilized NRD between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients undergoing endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease using relevant ICD-10-PCS. The cohort was divided based on the use of IVUS during the procedure. The primary outcome was major amputation at 6 months after index hospitalization. Measured confounders were matched using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighing method. We further performed a subgroup analysis based on disease severity, location of intervention, device, and procedure.A total of 434901 hospitalizations were included in the present analysis. PVI with IVUS compared with no IVUS had similar risk of amputation at 6 months (195 of 8939[2.17%] versus 10404 of 384003 [2.71%]);Hazard Ratio,0.98;CI, 0.77–1.25. Further, there was no difference in the rates of secondary outcomes. On subgroup analysis, amputation rates were significantly lower among patients with rest pain, in iliac intervention, or patients undergoing drug eluting stent implantation with the use of IVUS compared with no IVUS. This nationwide observational study showed that there was no difference in major amputation rates with the use of IVUS in patients undergoing PVI. However, in subgroup of patients with rest pain, iliac intervention or drug-eluting stent implantation IVUS use was associated with significantly lower major amputation rates.