Abstract

High concentrations of the ambient particulate matter remains a concern on the South African Highveld, particularly in densely populated low-income settlements. These areas have several local emission sources that contribute to poor air quality and are often located close to industrial and other urban areas. The local sources vary in magnitude, space, and time. In South Africa, little has been done to assess the impacts of spatiotemporal variability on the credibility of using isolated ambient observations for regulatory purposes. This study aims to evaluate the intra-urban variability of ambient PM2.5 concentrations in a dense, low-income community. Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in distinct microenvironments of KwaZamokuhle were simultaneously measured at 4 sites between March and June 2018. These measurements were collected using one permanent ambient monitoring station (AMS) and a temporary network of three E-BAM monitors (Site 2, Site 3, and Site 4). The daily PM2.5 concentrations at AMS, Site 2, Site 3, and Site 4 varied from 10 to 86 µg.m-3, 10 to 103 µg.m-3, 11 to 101 µg.m-3, and 9 to 113 µg.m-3, respectively. Extreme PM2.5 concentrations which exceeded the 24h PM2.5 NAAQS of 40 µg.m-3 were seen during the cold period (May and June); meanwhile, the warm period (March and April) recorded relatively lower PM2.5 episodes across different sections of KwaZamokuhle. During May-June, the highest diurnal concentrations of hourly averaged ambient PM2.5 were recorded at Site 4, in a downward sequence, followed by Site 3, Site 2, and AMS. Furthermore, the results showed that across KwaZamokuhle, Site 4 has the highest proportion of households using solid fuels for domestic purposes (cooking and heating) (55%) and the number of informal dwellings (117 households). Therefore, the study highlights the complexity of quantifying ambient air quality in an area where several local emission sources vary in space and time. Attempts to use monitoring data from a single station to assess ambient air quality, quantify human exposure, or evaluate the potential impacts of mitigation strategies in dense, low-income settlements should be done with care.

Highlights

  • Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution was the fourth leading global risk factor for premature mortality in 2019, contributing to 6.7 million early deaths (12% of total deaths globally) (Murray et al, 2020)

  • This study aims to evaluate how ambient PM2.5 varies in space and time inside a solid fuel burning community, in order to better understand the intraurban variability of air quality in a low-income settlement

  • Ninety-three percent of households in this EA use solid fuels for cooking and heating, and this could be a contributing factor to the high concentrations measured at Site 4 for all seasons. This finding reiterates the importance of using spatially refined data when assessing the drivers of household air pollution (HAP) in low-income communities, as averaging at even this small scale could conceal areas of concern for air quality management

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution was the fourth leading global risk factor for premature mortality in 2019, contributing to 6.7 million early deaths (12% of total deaths globally) (Murray et al, 2020). Exposure to household air pollution (HAP) from the use of solid fuels for cooking and heating, contributed to 2.31 million deaths in the same year, with the majority of these deaths occurring in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia (HEI, 2020). Residential solid fuel use in South Africa is low compared to other countries in the region. It remains prominent in many low-income urban and peri-urban settlements around the coalfields on the South African Highveld (StatsSA, 2019). It is estimated that household and ambient air pollution exposure contributed to 4 590 and 24 800 premature deaths of South Africans in 2019, respectively (HEI, 2020). Residential solid fuel burning, in low-income settlements, has been

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call