Abstract

PurposeIn vivo quantification of intervertebral motion through imaging has progressed to a point where biomarkers for low back pain are emerging. This makes possible deeper study of the condition’s biometrics. However, the measurement of change over time involves error. The purpose of this prospective investigation is to determine the intrasubject repeatability of six in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.MethodsIntrasubject reliability (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of baseline to 6-week follow-up measurements were calculated for six lumbar spine intervertebral motion parameters in 109 healthy volunteers. A standardised quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) protocol was used to provide measurements in the coronal and sagittal planes using both passive recumbent and active weight-bearing motion. Parameters were: intervertebral range of motion (IV-RoM), laxity, motion sharing inequality (MSI), motion sharing variability (MSV), flexion translation and anterior disc height change during flexion.ResultsThe best overall intrasubject reliability (ICC) and agreement (MDC) were for disc height (ICC 0.89, MDC 43%) and IV-RoM (ICC 0.96, MDC 60%), and the worst for MSV (ICC 0.04, MDC 408%). Laxity, MSI and translation had acceptable reliability (most ICCs > 0.60), but not agreement (MDC > 85%).ConclusionDisc height and IV-RoM measurement using QF could be considered for randomised trials, while laxity, MSI and translation could be considered for moderators, correlates or mediators of patient-reported outcomes. MSV had both poor reliability and agreement over 6 weeks.Graphical abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Highlights

  • Low back pain is the world’s largest cause of years lost to disability, but it usually has no objective diagnosis or known mechanism [1, 2]

  • The aim of this study was to determine the intrasubject reliability (ICC) [28] and minimal detectable change ­(MDC95) [11] of the repeated measurement of kinematic parameters during standardised active weight bearing and recumbent passive lumbar spine motion in flexion, extension, left- and right-side bending from L2-S1 using 2D quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) in healthy individuals over a period of 6 weeks

  • QF has been reported as measuring intervertebral range of motion (IV-RoM) in the cervical spine with levels of interobserver agreement ranging from 0.3° to 1.0° (SEM) and reliability of 0.92–0.99 (ICCs) [32] and in the lumbar spine with between 0.23° and 0.76° (SEM) and reliability of 0.94–0.99 (ICCs) [33]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low back pain is the world’s largest cause of years lost to disability, but it usually has no objective diagnosis or known mechanism [1, 2]. European Spine Journal (2019) 28:450–460 fluoroscopic imaging protocols (QF) has been linked to nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) as a biomarker [3,4,5], and many interventions exist to influence it [6,7,8]. This holds out the prospect of applying lumbar motion parameters as personalised biomarkers for the diagnosis of otherwise ‘nonspecific’ low back pain. Recommendations for scientific studies and regulatory submissions highlight the requirement to measure change; it is necessary to establish intrasubject repeatability over a credible intervention period for each parameter [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call