Abstract
This study compares the ontogenetic bone modeling patterns of the maxilla to the related morphological changes in three human populations to better understand how morphological variability within a species is established during ontogeny at both micro- and macroscopic levels. The maxillary bones of an ontogenetic sample of 145 subadult and adult individuals from Greenland (Inuit), Western Europe (France, Germany, and Portugal), and South Africa (Khoekhoe and San) were analyzed. Bone formation and resorption were quantified using histological methods to visualize the bone modeling patterns. In parallel, semilandmark geometric morphometric techniques were used on 3D models of the same individuals to capture the morphological changes. Multivariate statistics were applied and shape differences between age groups were visualized through heat maps. The three populations show differences in the degree of shape change acquired during ontogeny, leading to divergences in the developmental trajectories. Only subtle population differences in the bone modeling patterns were found, which were maintained throughout ontogeny. Bone resorption in adults mirrors the pattern found in subadults, but is expressed at lower intensities. Our data demonstrate that maxillary morphological differences observed in three geographically distinct human populations are also reflected at the microscopic scale. However, we suggest that these differences are mostly driven by changes in rates and timings of the cellular activities, as only slight discrepancies in the location of bone resorption could be observed. The shared general bone modeling pattern is likely characteristic of all Homo sapiens, and can be observed throughout ontogeny.
Highlights
Among present day humans, geographic variation in adult facial morphology has been reported as reflecting population affinities (Hanihara, 1996, 2000; Hennessy & Stringer, 2002; Howells, 1973, 1989; Lynch, Wood, & Luboga, 1996)
This study investigates for the first time the bone modeling patterns of several geographically distinct human populations, and shows the importance of considering a large, diverse sample to try to better represent the variation at the species level
We showed that Homo sapiens express overall similar general maxillary ontogenetic bone modeling patterns and shape changes, population-specific differences can be found at both levels
Summary
Geographic variation in adult facial morphology has been reported as reflecting population affinities (Hanihara, 1996, 2000; Hennessy & Stringer, 2002; Howells, 1973, 1989; Lynch, Wood, & Luboga, 1996). Adaptation to climate has been observed in facial features (Butaric & Maddux, 2016; Cui & Leclercq, 2017; Evteev, Cardini, Morozova, & O'Higgins, 2013; Harvati & Weaver, 2006; Hubbe, Hanihara, & Harvati, 2009; Nicholson & Harvati, 2006; Roseman & Weaver, 2004), in the shape of the nasal region (Churchill, Shackelford, Georgi, & Black, 2004; Franciscus & Long, 1991; Holton & Franciscus, 2008; Maddux, Yokley, Svoma, & Franciscus, 2016; Yokley, 2009). Noback, Harvati, and Spoor (2011), as well as Maddux, Butaric, Yokley, and Franciscus (2017), found correlations between cold-dry and hot-wet environments and the shape of the bony nose ( the nasal fossa), suggesting that aspects of the nasorespiratory system may be adaptations to particular environments. In comparison to the rest of the skull, facial components may be more plastic being subjected to diverse sources of variation (Smith, 2009; von Cramon-Taubadel, 2014)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.