Abstract

Although interspecific body size frequency distributions are well documented for many taxa, including the insects, intraspecific body size frequency distributions (IaBSFDs) are more poorly known, and their variation among mass-based and linear estimates of size has not been widely explored. Here we provide IaBSFDs for 16 species of insects based on both mass and linear estimates and large sample sizes (n≥100). In addition, we review the published IaBSFDs for insects, though doing so is complicated by their under-emphasis in the literature. The form of IaBSFDs can differ substantially between mass-based and linear measures. Nonetheless, in non-social insects they tend to be normally distributed (18 of 27 species) or in fewer instances positively skewed. Negatively skewed distributions are infrequently reported and log transformation readily removes the positive skew. Sexual size dimorphism does not generally cause bimodality in IaBSFDs. The available information on IaBSFDs in the social insects suggests that these distributions are usually positively skewed or bimodal (24 of 30 species). However, only c. 15% of ant genera are polymorphic, suggesting that normal distributions are probably more common, but less frequently investigated. Although only 57 species, representing seven of the 29 orders of insects, have been considered here, it appears that whilst IaBSFDs are usually normal, other distribution shapes can be found in several species, though most notably among the social insects. By contrast, the interspecific body size frequency distribution is typically right-skewed in insects and in most other taxa.

Highlights

  • Body size is one of the most striking traits of all organisms

  • We indicate what form of intraspecific body size frequency distributions (IaBSFDs) is typical of insects, the extent to which it might vary between mass and linear estimates of size, and how the IaBSFDs found for this group compare with those of other taxa

  • The untransformed IaBSFDs were significantly right-skewed in seven species, bimodal in two species, and one species had a significantly left-skewed distribution (Fig. 1, Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Body size is one of the most striking traits of all organisms. It is one of the most significant. The size-dependencies of these characteristics influence body size over the short-term and on longer, evolutionary time-scales [3,4]. One of the most commonly used ways of investigating interactions between physiological and ecological determinants of body size and how these might result in evolutionary size change (or stasis) is by examination of the form of and influences on the size frequency distributions of organisms. Such approaches are common to life history theory [3,6,7], macroecology [8] and palaeobiology [9]. Intraspecific and interspecific body size frequency distributions have played important roles in the development of these fields, and of macroecology, which regularly adopts univariate (i.e. frequency distribution-based), bivariate and multivariate perspectives to understanding large-scale spatial and temporal variation in body size, range size and abundance [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.