Abstract

Interspecific competition is a dominant force in animal communities that induces niche shifts in ecological and evolutionary time. If competition occurs, niche expansion can be expected when the competitor disappears because resources previously inaccessible due to competitive constraints can then be exploited (i.e., ecological release). Here, we aimed to determine the potential effects of interspecific competition between the little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) and the great bustard (Otis tarda) using a multidimensional niche approach with habitat distribution data. We explored whether the degree of niche overlap between the species was a density‐dependent function of interspecific competition. We then looked for evidences of ecological release by comparing measures of niche breadth and position of the little bustard between allopatric and sympatric situations. Furthermore, we evaluated whether niche shifts could depend not only on the presence of great bustard but also on the density of little and great bustards. The habitat niches of these bustard species partially overlapped when co‐occurring, but we found no relationship between degree of overlap and great bustard density. In the presence of the competitor, little bustard's niche was displaced toward increased use of the species' primary habitat. Little bustard's niche breadth decreased proportionally with great bustard density in sympatric sites, in consistence with theory. Overall, our results suggest that density‐dependent variation in little bustard's niche is the outcome of interspecific competition with the great bustard. The use of computational tools like kernel density estimators to obtain multidimensional niches should bring novel insights on how species' ecological niches behave under the effects of interspecific competition in ecological communities.

Highlights

  • The role of interspecific competition in structuring ecological communities and evolutionary diversification is a crucial long-­standing debate among ecologists, which can be addressed within the theoretical framework of ecological niche (Bolnick et al, 2010; Case & Gilpin, 1974; Chase & Leibold, 2003; Chesson, 1991)

  • The calculation of niche overlap required that the two-­dimensional habitat niches of little and great bustard were estimated inside a common niche space and the probability density functions evaluated in the same points in order to be comparable

  • Niche breadth was calculated as the number of cells of the two-­ dimensional kernel density estimator procedure (KDE) falling within the 95% defined region (Figure 1a)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The role of interspecific competition in structuring ecological communities and evolutionary diversification is a crucial long-­standing debate among ecologists, which can be addressed within the theoretical framework of ecological niche (Bolnick et al, 2010; Case & Gilpin, 1974; Chase & Leibold, 2003; Chesson, 1991). According to the niche release hypothesis (Schoener, 1989), the presence of great bustards should impose competitive restrictions to habitat use by little bustards, by limiting the access to the secondary habitat (cereal), thereby forcing an increased use of primary habitats (Tarjuelo et al, 2017) This should induce a decrease in little bustard’s habitat niche breadth and a niche displacement toward increased use of fallows and natural vegetation. We expect these shifts to be density-­dependent because interspecific competition and its effects intensify with great bustard density. We expect little bustard density to be positively related to little bustard’s niche breadth, and a displacement of niche position toward a higher use of cereals as little bustard density increases

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call