Abstract

Introduction:Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) must be valuable method for research and rehabilitation. So, the reliability of its measurements must be determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra-rater reliability of RUSI for measurement of multifidus (MF) muscles cross section areas (CSAs), bladder wall diameter, and thickness of MF muscles between 2 sessions in healthy subjects.Method:Fifteen healthy subjects through simple non-probability sampling participated in this single-group repeated-measures reliability study. MF muscles thickness at rest and during contraction, MF muscles CSAs at rest, and bladder diameters at rest and during pelvic floor muscles (PFM) contraction were measured through RUSI. Pearson’s correlation coefficient test was used to determine intra-rater reliability of variables.Finding:The results showed that intra-class correlation Coefficient (ICCs) values with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the standard error of the measurement (SEM) were good to excellent agreement for a single investigator between measurement occasions. The intra-rater reliability for the bladder wall displacement was high (ICCs for rest and PFM contraction state: 0.96 and 0.95 respectively), for the MF muscles CSAs at the L4 level was good to high (ICCs 0.75 and 0.91 for right (Rt) and left (Lt) side respectively), and for the thickness of MF muscles at two levels, at rest and during two tasks was moderate to high (ICCs: 0.64 to 0.87).Conclusion:The Trans-Abdominal (TA) method of RUSI is a reliable method to quantify the PFM contraction in healthy subjects. Also, the RUSI is a reliable method to measure the MF muscles CSAs, the MF muscles thickness at rest and during functional tasks in healthy subjects.

Highlights

  • Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) must be valuable method for research and rehabilitation

  • Finding: The results showed that intra-class correlation Coefficient (ICCs) values with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the standard error of the measurement (SEM) were good to excellent agreement for a single investigator between measurement occasions

  • pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and MF muscles contributed for trunk stability through feed-forward activation in response to trunk perturbation, the role of these muscles is important to stability of the spinal column (Hodges et al, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this study, there were moderate to high intra-rater reliability to measure the MF muscles CSAs, the MF muscles thickness at rest and during contraction, and bladder wall displacement as a reflection of PFM action through RUSI. We conclude that TA method of RUSI is a reliable method to quantify the PFM contraction in healthy subjects. RUSI is a reliable method to measure the MF muscles CSAs, the MF muscles thickness at rest and during functional tasks in healthy subjects

Inroduction
Study Design
Participants
Data Collection
Ultrasound Recordings of the MF muscles Thickness
Ultrasound Recordings of the MF muscles CSAs
Statistical Analysis
Results
Reliability of the TA method of RUSI
Reliability of RUSI for Measuring the MF Muscles CSAs
Reliability of RUSI for Measuring of the MF Muscles Thickness
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call