Intra-provincial benchmark analysis of COVID-19 in Canada

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unheralded challenges to people, business, government at all levels (federal, provincial, regional), and society at large. In addition to the direct consequences of taking care of infected people, which in some countries led to a virtual collapse of the healthcare system, the pandemic strained eldercare, employment, economic growth, and exacerbated mental health and social problems. During the first year of the pandemic, researchers’ and policy makers’ main focus was on ‘flattening the curve,’ and on predictive modeling of infections and deaths. In this paper we present a non-parametric data-driven descriptive analysis based on Data Envelopment Analysis to assess COVID-19 in ten Canadian provinces over the two year period 2020 to 2021. The objective is to derive worst- and best-case intra-provincial benchmarks to assess if and to what extent the situation could have been worse respectively better. To take account for any indirect socio-economic impact our analysis incorporates official monthly unemployment rates and a stringency index reflecting the level of social policy restrictions imposed by the provincial governments. A major contribution of the model framework is that it provides a mechanism for measuring the impact of the two main strategies in curbing the pandemic, namely vaccination and social policy restrictions. As a robustness check, the bench-mark results are compared against bias-corrected efficiency measures.