Intrapleural treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusions in the real world.

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and side‐effects of intrapleural treatment in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs).MethodsThe medical records of NSCLC patients with MPEs diagnosed in four Chinese hospitals from October 2014 to December 2019 were searched. The Kaplan–Meier method is used to calculate median overall survival (MOS) and subgroup analyses are done.ResultsA total of 285 patients were evaluated; 81.1% of patients received intrapleural treatment, and no patients received talc pleurodesis. MOS of the whole cohort was 21 months. Patients were divided into three groups: erythromycin group (EG; intrapleural treatment with drugs and erythromycin); intrathoracic treatment group (ITG; intrapleural treatment with drugs); control group (CG; no drug treatment in the pleural cavity). The MOS of patients in the EG, ITG and CG was 20, 22, and 19 months, respectively. Among patients who received only chemotherapy as systemic therapy, the MOS of intrathoracic administration group (IAG; i.e., EG and ITG) was longer than that of CG (12 vs. 6 months; p = 0.034), and the MOS of patients with a ratio of carcinoembryonic antigen in pleural effusion (PE‐CEA): CEA in blood (B‐CEA) ≤1 is worse than that of patients with a ratio >1 (4 vs. 12 months, p = 0.021) and that of CG (4 vs. 6 months, p = 0.442).ConclusionsIntrapleural treatment can prolong the survival of NSCLC patients with MPE who do not receive targeted treatment or who only receive chemotherapy. The PE‐CEA: B‐CEA ratio can be used to predict the efficacy if intrapleural treatment is indicated.