Abstract
SUMMARY In this study, we present the results of palaeomagnetic research conducted on Jurassic units of the Cañadón Asfalto Basin (CAB) in Patagonia, formed during Gondwana breakup. This basin is a key locality for understanding intraplate deformation within Patagonia during the Jurassic. The nature of this basin has been a subject of debate, based on the dynamics of the blocks that constitute its depocentres. In this context, the palaeomagnetic study of the Jurassic units of this basin provides a unique methodology to characterize the tectonic motions of its crustal blocks during its formation and development. To achieve this, we collected 350 samples from 53 sites in the sedimentary units of Las Leoneras (ca. 189 Ma) and Cañadón Calcáreo Formations (ca. 160–157 Ma), as well as the volcanic Lonco Trapial Group (ca. 185–172 Ma). The palaeomagnetic results from the sedimentary units show a regional remagnetization due to hydrothermal activity that obliterated the original remanence and overprinted a new one, simultaneously imprinting a secondary remanence in the volcanic units of the Lonco Trapial Group. When comparing the direction of the palaeomagnetic pole obtained from the remagnetized units with respect to average poles of equivalent ages, it is observed that the remagnetization must have occurred during the Late Jurassic (ca. 145 Ma). The age range in which this process occurred (Oxfordian to Aptian) and the direction of the calculated pole dispute a monster polar shift postulated for Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times. In addition, the primary magnetization recorded in the units of the Lonco Trapial Group indicates a counterclockwise rotation of the studied crustal blocks between 21° and 11°, which, in line with previous studies, refutes large-scale dextral motion along the Gastre Fault System since the Jurassic. Similar counterclockwise rotations of equivalent magnitudes are found along the units overlying the Palaeozoic Central Patagonian Igneous–Metamorphic Belt, which represents the opposite shear sense compared to the Jurassic units beyond this belt. This is interpreted as a reactivation of the Palaeozoic belt structures in the opposite sense, from transpressive during the Palaeozoic to transtensive during the Mesozoic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
