Abstract
Most of the previous randomized controlled trials have shown no advantage of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) over intermittent auscultation (IA) in either lowor high-risk pregnancies [1—3], but studies specifically regarding postcesarean pregnancies are sparse. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends both EFM and IA as equally effective in monitoring labor in women with postcesarean pregnancies, whereas British protocol recommends continuous electronic fetal monitoring [4]. In India, IA is the standard
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
