Abstract

Aim of the study: to evaluate the results of using intraoperative radiotherapy (IO RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (RC).Material and Methods. A total of 172 patients with histologically confirmed stage II –III (pT3–4 or pN+) RC were included in this retrospective analysis; of those, 92 (53,5 %) were treated with IO RT alone and 80 (46,5 %) received both neoadjuvant EBRT and IO RT. The median follow-up was 25 months for the IO RT group and 22 months for the EBRT/IO RT group (p=0,52).Results. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5,4 %. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in 4-year overall survival rates (59,1 % in the IO RT group versus 67,4 % in the EBRT / IO RT group, p=0,66), progression-free survival (53,6 versus 55,1 %, p=0,51) and local progression free survival (59,4 versus 65,4 %, p=0,70).Conclusion. IO RT for locally advanced RC is a safe method that ensures adequate local control and can be considered as an effective treatment method both in an isolated version and in integration into a multimodal treatment algorithm in a specialized oncological clinics.

Highlights

  • Значительный опыт применения интраоперационной радиотерапии (ИОРТ) при различных злокачественных новообразованиях накоплен отечественными онкологами [8–10]

  • A total of 172 patients with histologically confirmed stage II–III rectal cancer (RC) were included in this retrospective analysis; of those, 92 (53,5 %) were treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) alone and 80 (46,5 %) received both neoadjuvant EBRT and IORT

  • Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest

Read more

Summary

МЕСТНОРАСПРОСТРАНЕННОГО РАКА ПРЯМОЙ КИШКИ

Цель исследования – оценка результатов применения интраоперационной радиотерапии (ИОРТ) фотонной радиохирургической системой у пациентов с местнораспространенным раком прямой кишки (мРПК). Проведен ретроспективный анализ результатов лечения 172 пациентов с гистологически подтвержденным РПК II–III стадии (pT3–4 или pN+), которым выполнена хирургическая операция и ИОРТ (n=92) или неоадъювантная дистанционная лучевая терапия (ДЛТ), операция и ИОРТ (n=80). Не отмечено значимых различий между обеими группами в показателях 4-летней общей выживаемости (59,1 % в группе ИОРТ против 67,4 % в группе ДЛТ/ИОРТ, р=0,66), выживаемости без прогрессирования (53,6 против 55,1 %, p=0,51) и выживаемости без местного рецидива (59,4 против 65,4 %, p=0,70). При дополнительном анализе подгрупп с РПК II и III стадии не обнаружено значимых различий в общей выживаемости между группами ИОРТ и ДЛТ/ИОРТ (p=0,63 и p=0,98 соответственно).

Характеристика групп пациентов General characteristics of patients
СВЕДЕНИЯ ОБ АВТОРАХ
ВКЛАД АВТОРОВ
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.