Abstract

BackgroundStandard sampling methods to evaluate the proliferative ability of meningioma have not been established.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative rapid flow cytometry (iFC) using raw samples for the quantitative assessment of proliferative ability in meningioma cells and to investigate intratumoral heterogeneity. Proliferation index (PI) was defined as the ratio of aneuploid cells with an abnormal number of chromosomes to the total cells.ResultsFrom 50 patients, 118 specimens were analyzed. There was a statistically significant correlation between the postoperative MIB‐1 labeling index (LI) and PI (R = 0.59, P < 0.0001). A higher PI was correlated with a higher annual growth rate (AGR, cm3/y) (R = 0.50, P = 0.0002, 26 patients). AGR showed a correlation with the intratumoral distribution of PI. PI was the highest at the center or the peripheral section of the tumor in tumors with high AGR, whereas it was highest at the dural attachment in tumors with low AGR (P = 0.039, n = 20). Pial feeders were more frequently observed when PI was high in the center or in the peripheral section (P = 0.006, n = 37).ConclusionsRapid iFC may thus become a substitute for MIB‐1 LI. Intratumoral heterogeneity of cellular proliferative potential exists in meningiomas and is related to tumor biological characteristics such as AGR and development of pial feeders. This observation underscores the importance of standardization in the sampling method to accurately estimate the risk of meningioma recurrence.

Highlights

  • Radical resection is usually the best strategy in meningioma surgery for long‐term tumor control and maintenance of neurological functions.[1,2] some meningiomas are not amenable to aggressive resection due to their severe adhesion to critical structures such as cranial nerves, arteries, and veins, as well as brain invasion

  • This study showed a close relationship between the MIB‐1 labeling index (LI) and the result of intraoperative rapid flow cytometry (iFC)

  • Rapid iFC can be used as a substitute for MIB‐1 LI, which may contribute to achieving safe maximal resection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radical resection is usually the best strategy in meningioma surgery for long‐term tumor control and maintenance of neurological functions.[1,2] some meningiomas are not amenable to aggressive resection due to their severe adhesion to critical structures such as cranial nerves, arteries, and veins, as well as brain invasion. Some meningiomas are not amenable to aggressive resection due to their severe adhesion to critical structures such as cranial nerves, arteries, and veins, as well as brain invasion In such cases, surgeons are required to properly weigh the risks of postoperative complications and the benefits of aggressive resection to maximize the benefits to the patient without having specific pathological information. Methods: This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative rapid flow cytometry (iFC) using raw samples for the quantitative assessment of proliferative ability in meningioma cells and to investigate intratumoral heterogeneity. Intratumoral heterogeneity of cellular proliferative potential exists in meningiomas and is related to tumor biological characteristics such as AGR and development of pial feeders. This observation underscores the importance of standardization in the sampling method to accurately estimate the risk of meningioma recurrence

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call