Abstract

Study ObjectiveEstablish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employment by anesthesia providers, and describe various deployment facilitators described in current literature.MeasurementsAn exhaustive literature review of the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed applying the search terms “gastric tube”, “complications”, “decompression”, “blind insertion”, “perioperative”, “intraoperative” in various order sequences. A five-year limit was applied to limit the number and timeliness of articles selected.Main ResultsPatients are exposed to potentially serious morbidity and mortality from blindly inserted gastric tubes. Risk factors associated with malposition include blind insertion, the presence of endotracheal tubes, altered sensorium, and previous tube misplacements. Pulmonary aspiration risk prevention remains the only indication for anesthesia-related intraoperative use. There are no singularly effective tools that predict or verify the proper placement of blindly inserted gastric tubes. Current placement facilitation techniques are perpetuated through anecdotal experience and technique variability warrants further study.ConclusionIn the absence of aspiration risk factors or the need for surgical decompression in ASA classification I & II patients, a moratorium should be instituted on the elective use of gastric tubes.

Highlights

  • According to a healthcare study published by the Society of Actuaries in 2010, over 19 billion healthcare dollars were spent in the United States on preventable medical errors [1]

  • Study Objective: Establish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employment by anesthesia providers, and describe various deployment facilitators described in current literature

  • In 2013, over a million nasogastric tubes were inserted in the United States and the reported rate of misplacements in medical literature was estimated at 1.2% - 2.4% with over half occurring in mechanically ventilated patients [2] [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to a healthcare study published by the Society of Actuaries in 2010, over 19 billion healthcare dollars were spent in the United States on preventable medical errors [1]. One lumen allows for drainage or as a conduit for medications and lavage while the second lumen functions to permit air passage Lacking this innovation, negative pressure can result in a stomach lining injury or promote a mechanical obstruction. This was compellingly illustrated in an editorial aptly named “The other tube in the airway: what do we know about it?” by Martin & Aunspaugh [4] They maintain that gastric tube use by anesthesia providers is based on ritual and that evidential support is lacking. They called for more research and dialogue to examine the value of gastric tube insertions in the absence of aspiration risk or surgical indications

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call