Intraoperative Flow Measurement as a Quality Control during Carotid Endarterectomy in a Teaching Hospital Setting

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the technical results of an arterial repair, a variety of intraoperative imaging and assessment techniques can be used during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative ultrasound flow measurement as a quality control after primary CEA in a teaching hospital setting. Methods: Over 36 months, 107 consecutive CEAs were performed at our institution. Retrospectively acquired demographics, intraoperative flow measurements, duplex results, revisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. Postoperative 30-day transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, and death rates were analyzed. Results were compared with ultrasound flow measurement and duplex ultrasonography. Results: From March 2012 to March 2015, 107 primary consecutive CEAs were performed in 107 patients (71% male, 29% female), whose age ranged from 51 to 81 years with a mean age of 68 ± 4 years. Associated risk factors included diabetes for 89 (83%), smoking for 92 (86%), hypertension for 94 (87.8%), chronic renal insufficiency for 71 (66%), and coronary artery disease for 57 (53%) of the patients. Early postoperative duplex scans in all 107 patients showed no significant changes from intraoperative findings. The ipsilateral stroke and death rate in this study was 0 (0/107) and the 30-day death and stroke rate was also 0 (0/107), with no significant difference between trainees and senior surgeons. Three patients (2.8%) had flow < 100 mL/Min and two of them were revised after completion of contrast angiography. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the intraoperative flow measurement is an alternative method for detecting technical errors and a tool for quality-control imaging. Especially for trainees, it makes sense to ensure effectiveness of the procedure upon its completion and to assess the technical adequacy of CEA.