Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the differences in clinical outcomes, if any, between intraoperative acute correction and postoperative gradual correction for tibial shaft fractures with multiplanar posttraumatic deformities using the hexapod external fixator.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 58 consecutive patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the hexapod external fixator at our institution from January 2015 to April 2019. Twenty-three patients (Group I) underwent intraoperative acute correction, from January 2015 to October 2016. Starting in November 2016, the other 35 patients (Group II) all underwent postoperative gradual correction. The demographic data, operation duration, original residual deformities before correction, residual deformities after correction, and external fixation time were collected and analyzed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Johner-Wruhs criteria at the last clinical visit.ResultsAll patients achieved complete bone union with a mean time of 28.7 ± 4.6 weeks (range 21 to 37 weeks) in Group I and 27.9 ± 4.8 weeks (range 19 to 38 weeks) in Group II (P > 0.05). The operation duration in Group I (88.9 ± 7.7 min) was longer than that in Group II (61.9 ± 8.4 min), and there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in original residual deformities before correction and residual deformities after correction (P > 0.05). The rate of postoperative complication was similar between the two groups. There was no statistical significance in demographic data and clinical outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThere is no difference in clinical outcomes between intraoperative acute correction and postoperative gradual correction for tibial shaft fractures with multiplanar posttraumatic deformities using the hexapod external fixator. Postoperative gradual correction may shorten the duration in the operation room and decrease the potential intraoperative risk.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe hexapod external fixator (HEF), such as the Taylor spatial frame (TSF), consisting of 2 full or partial rings connected by 6 telescopic struts at special universal joints, is a practical tool for limb deformity correction [1,2,3]

  • Postoperative gradual correction may shorten the duration in the operation room and decrease the potential intraoperative risk

  • The hexapod external fixator (HEF), such as the Taylor spatial frame (TSF), consisting of 2 full or partial rings connected by 6 telescopic struts at special universal joints, is a practical tool for limb deformity correction [1,2,3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The hexapod external fixator (HEF), such as the Taylor spatial frame (TSF), consisting of 2 full or partial rings connected by 6 telescopic struts at special universal joints, is a practical tool for limb deformity correction [1,2,3]. The HEF provides all the advantages of multiplanar fixation and is equipped with the versatility of spatial deformities correction without altering the frame. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in clinical outcomes, if any, between intraoperative acute correction and postoperative gradual correction for tibial shaft fractures with multiplanar posttraumatic deformities using the hexapod external fixator

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call