Abstract

Although New World cutaneous leishmaniasis is not itself a life-threatening disease, its treatment with systemic antimonials can cause toxicity that can be dangerous to some patients. Intralesional meglumine antimoniate provides a viable, less toxic alternative. Herein, we describe an alternative treatment with subcutaneous intralesional injections of meglumine antimoniate into large periarticular lesions of three patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and comorbidities. This treatment was safe, successful, and well tolerated. This case series suggests that intralesional meglumine antimoniate is an effective therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis, even with periarticular lesions. This hypothesis should be tested in controlled clinical trials.

Highlights

  • The first-choice treatment for American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) is systemic pentavalent antimonials

  • We describe an alternative treatment with subcutaneous intralesional injections of meglumine antimoniate into large periarticular lesions of three patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and comorbidities

  • The World Health Organization recommended that decisions regarding treatment must be based mainly on the risk–benefit ratio of the intervention for each patient, and that local and less toxic treatments should be explored since mucocutaneous leishmaniasis occurs in less than 5% of cases, and systemic treatment does not prevent its occurrence[1]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The first-choice treatment for American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) is systemic pentavalent antimonials. The National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INI), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), is a referral center for the treatment of ATL in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. At this institution, intralesional (IL) treatment with meglumine antimoniate (MA) has been performed for over 30 years in selected patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis without mucosal lesions[2], especially in those with contraindications to the systemic use of MA3. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) recommends that IL therapy should be administered via the intradermal route in referral centers for single lesions up to 900 mm[2] in any location except the head and periarticular sites when immunosuppression is absent and patient follow-up is possible[5].

DISCUSSION
Findings
Method of parasitological confirmation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call