Intralesional curettage and surgical adjuvants in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Abstract

The ideal treatment for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is still controversial. Various surgical adjuvants have been introduced following intralesional curettage to improve local control rates. However, findings from relevant studies are inconsistent, and no consensus has been reached. The purpose of this study is to determine what intraoperative adjuvant is effective in decreasing the recurrence of GCTB. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the PubMed and Embase electronic databases which assessed the recurrence rate of GCTB following intralesional curettage with or without various surgical adjuvants. Two authors independently evaluated all publications. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata/MP (Version 17.0, StataCorp LLC, TX, USA) and Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Pooled risk ratio (RR) was used for analysis, with P values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Twenty-four studies involving 2,579 patients were included in this analysis. The overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without high-speed burring (HSB) are 11.9% (26/218) and 47.7% (92/193), respectively. The pooled RR for tumor recurrence is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.49, P<0.001). In the meanwhile, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without chemical adjuvants are 23.5% (77/328) and 26.1% (73/280), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63 to 1.10, P=0.89). Additionally, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) are 20.4% (205/1,006) and 33.4% (314/939), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50 to 0.69, P<0.001). Intraoperative application of HSB or PMMA has an additional antitumor effect, while the use of phenol or H2O2 fails to make any significant difference (PROSPERO: CRD42022344262).