Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fetal cardiac dysfunction may be 1 part of the pathophysiology of pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal cardiac dysfunction. Systematic searches were performed on the databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to March 2, 2023) for studies evaluating fetal cardiac function in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in addition to the reference lists of included studies. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the fetal cardiac function by fetal echocardiography in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (mild or severe) and compared with fetuses of healthy pregnant women. The studies published in English were included. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data on fetal myocardial performance index, E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio, and PR interval were pooled for the meta-analysis using random-effects models. The results were presented as weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. This meta-analysis was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42022334801). A total of 14 studies were included in this qualitative analysis. Of note, 10 studies that reported data on fetal myocardial performance index, E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio, and PR interval were included in the quantitative analysis and showed a significant association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal cardiac dysfunction. Significantly higher fetal left ventricular myocardial performance index values (weighted mean difference, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.16) and longer fetal PR intervals (weighted mean difference, 10.10 ms; 95% confidence interval, 7.34-12.86) were revealed in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Compared with the situation in pregnancies complicated by mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, PR intervals were even longer in pregnancies complicated by severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (weighted mean difference, 5.98 ms; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-11.77). There was no significant difference in fetal E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio between the group with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and the healthy pregnant group (weighted mean difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.05). Our findings supported the idea that intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with overall impaired fetal myocardial performance and impaired fetal cardiac conduction system. However, current evidence about the association between fetal cardiac dysfunction and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-induced stillbirth is lacking. Further studies are needed to reveal the relationship between fetal cardiac dysfunction and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.