Abstract

Simple SummarySpodoptera frugiperda is a native noctuid pest of the Western Hemisphere with a growing global distribution. It is polyphagous by nature and is the primary insect pest attacking maize in Florida. Larval feeding damage has resulted in crop yield losses of up to 20% or more in the United States. In other parts of the world, it causes maize yield losses of between 17–72%. Consequently, regular pesticide applications have led to insecticide-resistant strains of S. frugiperda. Herein, we propose using biological control agents as an alternative pest management strategy. Augmentative biological control allows for the strategic release of these agents where they are sparse or absent in open fields. However, insects are complex organisms with an array of intraguild interactions that might contradict such an effort. Therefore, the goal of improving these agents’ use for alternative pest control requires evaluating their interactions as expressed in the same guild.The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a maize pest worldwide. Its host range comprises more than 350 reported plant species, and it is the primary insect pest attacking maize in Florida. Global trade has not only assisted but accelerated its invasion into the Eastern Hemisphere. Regular pesticide use promotes resistance in the species; therefore, there is an urgent need for alternative pest management strategies. This study evaluated the interactions of biological control agents within a similar guild. Some of the reported interactions could potentially lead to the integration of these agents within the same niche to increase biological control efficiency against the fall armyworm. We evaluated three biocontrol agents that are natural enemies of Lepidopteran pests, the true bugs Podisus maculiventris and Euthyrhynchus floridanus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and a parasitoid, Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Depending on their intraguild interactions, these agents could potentially be useful for biological control of the fall armyworm. The study investigated these three biocontrol agents and concluded that integrating these agents to control the fall armyworm is a possibility; however, only under certain conditions. Investigations were focused on evaluating the predator–parasitoid and devised pairing interactions. Predator response to prey in a choice or no-choice scenario and choices based on olfaction or other bodily cues were studied under experimental laboratory conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call