Abstract

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)of the pancreas is a relatively new entity that has gained increased attention because of its unique features - presence of different subtypes with different malignant potential, biological behavior, and prognosis, higher rates of recurrences and concomitant or metachronous pancreatic duct cancer. It is rare with an incidence of 4 to 5 cases per 100000. The relative lack of experience significantly hampers decision making for surgery (pancreatic head resection, distal pancreatectomy or enucleation) or follow-up.Herein we present two cases managed by diametrically different tactic according to the risk stratification - distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and observation, respectively. An up-to-date literature review on the key points in diagnostics, indications for surgery, the extent of surgery, follow-up, and prognosis is provided.The tailored approach based on risk stratification is the cornerstone of management. Absolute indications for surgery are the lesions with high-risk stigmata, whereas the worrisome features should be evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration. Main duct and mixed type are usually referred to surgery, whereas the management of a branch type is more conservative due to the lower rate of invasive cancer. Strict postoperative follow-up is mandatory even in negative resection margins due to a high risk for recurrences and metachronous lesions.Despite the guidelines, the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm remains a major challenge for clinicians and surgeons in the balance the risk/benefit of observation versus resection. Risk stratification plays a key role in decision-making. Future trials need to determine the optimal period of surveillance and the most reliable predictive factors for concomitant pancreatic duct cancer.

Highlights

  • Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a cystic pancreatic neoplasm characterized by intraductal papillary proliferation of mucin-producing cells

  • Another conundrum is the extremely difficult differential diagnosis with synchronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which occurs in 5.3% of the cases with IMPN.[1,10,11]

  • MD and mixed type are usually referred to surgery, whereas a more conservative approach is used for BD-IPMN because of the lower risk for malignancy (18% vs. 43% in MD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a cystic pancreatic neoplasm characterized by intraductal papillary proliferation of mucin-producing cells It is a relatively new entity described in 1980, which rapidly focused the scientific attention because of its unique features – the presence of different subtypes with different malignant potential, biological behaviour and prognosis, higher rates of recurrences and synchronous or metachronous pancreatic duct cancer. An important issue is the differential diagnosis with benign pancreatic tumours.[8,9] Another conundrum is the extremely difficult differential diagnosis with synchronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which occurs in 5.3% of the cases with IMPN.[1,10,11]

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call