Abstract
ObjectivesHow changes in intracranial compliance (ICC), resistance to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-outflow (Rout), and pressure-volume index (PVI) can play a prominent role in clarifying the complexities in the biomechanism and treatment outcomes of hydrocephalus. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review to find the correlation between ICC, Rout, and PVI with intracranial pressure (ICP) characteristics, as well as morphometric parameters, in hydrocephalus patients. Material and methodsElectronic searches were conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Ovid, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases from their dates of inception to December 2022 using filters for English-language articles. The article selection and data collection were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and recommendations. We assigned a quality score for each study to evaluate the information and selection bias. The certainty of the pooled data for all articles was assessed based on GRADE criteria. The Funnel plot asymmetry study was used to evaluate publication bias. ResultsThe overall pre-treatment ICC, Rout, and PVI were 0.45 ml/mmHg (95% CI, 0.33-0.57; I2=99.7%; P<0.001), 14.93 mmHg/(ml/min) (95% CI, 13.65-16.21; I2= 99.7%; P<0.001) and 19.26 ml (95% CI, 15.63-22.89; I2=98.7%; P<0.001), respectively. The pooled Rout was observed to be higher in adult hydrocephalus compared to pediatric hydrocephalus, whereas the opposite trend was found for PVI. Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) exhibited a higher pooled Rout compared to communicating hydrocephalus. Patients with unimproved outcomes demonstrated a decrease in the effect size of the pooled Rout. The results also showed significant correlations were observed between all ICP characteristics and both the ICC and Rout. The correlation between ICC and the ventricular score was significant. Rout had a significant correlation with the third ventricle index. PVI had significant correlations with Evan's ratio, inverse cella media, and ventricular score. ConclusionThe results indicate the possible reason for publication bias in some subgroups may be related to methodological heterogeneity in the measurement of pressure-volume parameters. This finding motivates researchers to investigate the effects of different invasive and non-invasive methods on the measurement results of ICC, Rout, and PVI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.