Abstract
BackgroundThrombectomy is a standard treatment for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO); however, its effectiveness in treating LVO related to intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare thrombectomy outcomes in ICAD-related and embolic LVO, focusing on patients with similar symptom severities upon hospital admission. MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted at Jikei University Hospital and Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital between October 2017 and March 2023. Ischemic stroke patients with LVO who underwent thrombectomy were categorized into ICAD and embolism groups based on the occlusion mechanism. Groups were matched using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at the time of admission. A modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 at 90 days after symptom onset was defined as a devastating outcome. The procedural outcomes and frequency of devastating outcomes were compared between the ICAD and embolism groups. ResultsThe study included 33 matched pairs were included. The ICAD group showed lower rates of successful reperfusion (43 % vs. 82 %, p = 0.001), and longer procedural times (median 88 min vs. 50 min, p < 0.001) than the embolism group. The ICAD group had a significantly higher frequency of devastating outcomes than the non-ICAD group (39 % vs. 15 %, p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified ICAD as an independent factor associated with devastating outcomes (OR, 3.804; 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI), 1.148–12.603; p = 0.029). ConclusionIn thrombectomy therapy, reperfusion rates and outcomes are significantly worse in patients with ICAD-LVO than in patients with embolic LVO.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.