Intraclutch egg size variation is independent of ecological context among years in the European Starling Sturnus vulgaris

Abstract

Female birds can potentially utilise various mechanisms, such as intraclutch egg size variation (ICESV), to modulate offspring quality. If this represents an ‘adaptive’ strategy allowing females to adjust reproductive effort after laying of the first egg, as information on resources becomes more predictable later in the laying sequence, then we would predict that ICESV would vary with ecological context, e.g. in ‘good’ versus ‘bad’ years. Here, in European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), we tested specific predictions that (1) females would lay relatively small last laid eggs in ‘poor’ years (with early laying and below-average breeding productivity); and (2) that ICESV would be lower in good years (late laying, above-average productivity) so that late-hatched chicks would not be disadvantaged. At the individual level we predicted (3) that repeatability of ICESV would be low if females adjusted this in relation to the environment in different years; and (4) that within-individual variation in ICESV should correlate with the number, and timing, of loss of chicks. Mean ICESV averaged −1.9% (measured as last egg mass relative to mean egg mass), typical of other hole-nesting passerines. However, our results did not support any of our hypotheses: (1) although there was annual variation in ICESV, in all years egg mass decreased through the laying sequence; (2) annual variation in ICESV was not consistent with variation in phenology or breeding productivity among years; (3) marked individual variation in ICESV (last laid egg varied from −20 to +10% relative to mean egg mass within clutches) was repeatable, i.e. individual females did not adjust ICESV in subsequent breeding attempts; and (4) variation in the magnitude of ICESV, alone and combined with hatching asynchrony, did not predict early brood loss. Our study suggests that ICESV is a relatively inflexible component of an individual female’s phenotype that might contribute to variation in individual quality.