Abstract

The paper highlights the conflict in benefit sharing among four different communities (hamlets) spread over different geographical areas in a conservation and development programme. Four different hamlets under a single administrative entity (revenue village) are brought under JFPM to manage forests. All the four hamlets are expected to contribute equally to the conservation and management activities. In return, these hamlets are provided financial assistance to be utilised for development activities. Every time, forest department releases the grants under the development component, there is a problem in the Community, as to how the grants are to be shared among different hamlets? It is not merely the money that is involved, it is about, how leaders from different hamlets demand for a share in the grants, which are so small that if shared in different or equal proportions among the hamlets, there is hardly any development activity. It goes on to narrate how the Managing Committee negotiates in the conflict situation with the beneficiaries and how such conflicts can have a negative impact on the conservation activities if there are no policy interventions in unclear cases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.