Abstract

Little is known about whether guideline-recommended ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation results in optimal partial carbon dioxide (pCO2) levels or favorable outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the association between intra-arrest pCO2 level and the outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study, including adult patients with OHCA who did not achieve a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) upon hospital arrival and whose blood gas analysis was performed before the ROSC between June 2014 and December 2017. The patients were categorized into four quartiles based on their intra-arrest carbon dioxide levels: Quartile 1 (<66.0 mmHg), Quartile 2 (66.1-87.2 mmHg), Quartile 3 (87.3-113.5 mmHg), and Quartile 4 (≥113.6 mmHg). The primary outcome was 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes defined as cerebral performance Category 1 or 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between pCO2 and favorable neurological outcomes. During the study period, 20 913 patients were eligible for the analysis. The proportion of favorable neurological outcomes was 1.8% (90/5133), 0.7% (35/5232), 0.4% (19/5263), and 0.2% (9/5285) in Quartiles 1-4, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the probability of favorable neurological outcome decreased with increased intra-arrest carbon dioxide levels (i.e. Q1 vs. Q4, adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.55, P for trend <0.001). Lower intra-arrest pCO2 levels were associated with a favorable neurological outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.