Abstract

BackgroundWe sought to determine the intra- and inter-radiation therapist reproducibility of a previously established matching technique for daily verification and correction of isocenter position relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM).Materials and methodsWith the patient in the treatment position, anterior-posterior and left lateral electronic images are acquired on an amorphous silicon flat panel electronic portal imaging device. After each portal image is acquired, the therapist manually translates and aligns the fiducial markers in the image to the marker contours on the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The distances between the planned and actual isocenter location is displayed. In order to determine the reproducibility of this technique, four therapists repeated and recorded this operation two separate times on 20 previously acquired portal image datasets from two patients. The data were analyzed to obtain the mean variability in the distances measured between and within observers.ResultsThe mean and median intra-observer variability ranged from 0.4 to 0.7 mm and 0.3 to 0.6 mm respectively with a standard deviation of 0.4 to 1.0 mm. Inter-observer results were similar with a mean variability of 0.9 mm, a median of 0.6 mm, and a standard deviation of 0.7 mm. When using a 5 mm threshold, only 0.5% of treatments will undergo a table shift due to intra or inter-observer error, increasing to an error rate of 2.4% if this threshold were reduced to 3 mm.ConclusionWe have found high reproducibility with a previously established method for daily verification and correction of isocenter position relative to prostatic fiducial markers using electronic portal imaging.

Highlights

  • Carcinoma of the prostate is the most common form of cancer in men [1]

  • In 2005, 232,090 new cases of prostate cancer and 30,350 prostate cancer deaths were projected in the United States [1]

  • Given the relatively small treatment fields used with conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, there is a greater need for accurate targeting and daily localization of the prostate gland, a task is being performed by radiation therapists/technologists

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carcinoma of the prostate is the most common form of cancer in men [1]. In 2005, 232,090 new cases of prostate cancer and 30,350 prostate cancer deaths were projected in the United States [1]. Given the relatively small treatment fields used with conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, there is a greater need for accurate targeting and daily localization of the prostate gland, a task is being performed by radiation therapists/technologists. 11% of patients showed an inferior shift of the prostate of more than 1 cm and 30% showed a posterior shift of more than 1 cm [3]. This variation in position cannot be assessed with external skin marks or bony landmarks, the standard approach used by radiation therapists on a daily basis. We sought to determine the intra- and inter-radiation therapist reproducibility of a previously established matching technique for daily verification and correction of isocenter position relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.