Intra- and Inter-Physician Agreement in Therapeutic Decision for Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Abstract

BackgroundLarge variation in diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations may hinder the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and also compromise correct interpretation of the results of multicenter clinical trials, especially in subjects with non-severe OSA. The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic decision-making between different sleep physicians in patients with AHI<40events/h. MethodsSix experienced senior sleep specialists from different sleep centers of Spain were asked to make a therapeutic decision (CPAP treatment) based on anonymized recordings of patients with suspected OSA that has previously performed a sleep study. The clinical data was shown in an online database and included anthropometric features, clinical questionnaires, comorbidities, physical examination and sleep study results. Intra- and inter-observer decision-making were analyzed by the Fleiss tm) Kappa statistics (Kappa). ResultsA total of 720 medical decisions were taken to analyze the agreement between sleep professionals. Overall intra-observer evaluation reliability was almost perfect (Kappa=0.83, 95% CI, 0.75•0.90, p<0.001). However, overall inter-observer concordance decreased to moderate agreement (Kappa=0.46, 95% CI, 0.42•0.51, p<0.001). Nevertheless, it was especially low when considering AHI<15events/h. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a good intra-observer concordance in the therapeutic decision-making of different sleep physicians treating patients with low/moderate OSA. However, when analyzing inter-observer agreement the results were considerably worse. These findings underline the importance of developing improved consensus management protocols.