Intra- and inter-observer reliability of quantitative analysis of the infra-patellar fat pad and comparison between fat- and non-fat-suppressed imaging—Data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Abstract

The infra-patellar fat pad (IPFP), as intra-articular adipose tissue represents a potential source of pro-inflammatory cytokines and its size has been suggested to be associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. This study examines inter- and intra-observer reliability of fat-suppressed (fs) and non-fat-suppressed (nfs) MR imaging for determination of IPFP morphological measurements as novel biomarkers.The IPFP of nine right knees of healthy Osteoarthritis Initiative participants was segmented by five readers, using fs and nfs baseline sagittal MRIs. The intra-observer reliability was determined from baseline and 1-year follow-up images. All segmentations were quality controlled (QC) by an expert reader. Reliability was expressed as root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV%).After QC, the inter-observer reliability for fs (nfs) imaging was 2.0% (1.1%) for IPFP volume, 2.1%/2.5% (1.6%/1.8%) for anterior/posterior surface areas, 1.8% (1.8%) for depth, and 2.1% (2.4%) for maximum sagittal area. The intra-observer reliability was 3.1% (5.0%) for volume, 2.3%/2.8% (2.5%/2.9%) for anterior/posterior surfaces, 1.9% (3.5%) for depth, and 3.3% (4.5%) for maximum sagittal area. IPFP volume from nfs images was systematically greater (+7.3%) than from fs images, but highly correlated (r=0.98).The results suggest that quantitative measurements of IPFP morphology can be performed with satisfactory reliability when expert QC is implemented. The IPFP is more clearly depicted in nfs images, and there is a small systematic off-set versus analysis from fs images. However, the high linear relationship between fs and nfs imaging suggests that fs images can be used to analyze IPFP morphology, when nfs images are not available.