Abstract

The exploratory behaviour of the genetically derived Maudsley rat model of emotionality has been well characterized. Maudsley reactives (MR) present with more 'anxious-like' behaviour than Maudsley nonreactives (MNR). Although this behaviour is assumed to be associated with altered adrenocortical function, the few studies addressing this issue have produced inconsistent findings. We therefore set out to investigate the adrenal endocrinology of the MR and MNR strains. Control Wistars, the ancestors of the Maudsleys, have been used for the first time to set the baseline for all the experiments carried out. It was found that the MNR strain had a significantly blunted adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) response to restraint stress compared with Wistars, but a normal corticosterone response. Conversely, the MR had a significantly exaggerated ACTH response to restraint stress, but a normal corticosterone response. This finding suggested that the MR adrenal is less sensitive to ACTH than the MNR. This was confirmed by investigating the corticosterone dose-response to ACTH in adrenals from the two strains incubated in vitro. Several possible intra-adrenal regulators were investigated, but the only significant molecular difference in the adrenal glands from the two strains was the level of expression of neuropeptide Y (NPY), which is known to be a stress-responsive peptide in the adrenal. We propose that intra-adrenal NPY is responsible for blunting adrenocortical responses to ACTH stimulation in the MR strain. The observed changes in adrenal NPY suggest that this rat strain may serve as a model of chronic stress, with the MR phenotype representing maladaptation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.